Evidence-based public health: not only whether it works, but how it can be made to work practicably at scale
نویسنده
چکیده
Because public health must operate at scale in widely diverse, complex situations, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have limited utility for public health. Other methodologies are needed. A key conceptual backbone is a detailed "theory of change" to apply appropriate evidence for each operational component. Synthesizing patterns of findings across multiple methodologies provides key insights. Programs operating successfully across a variety of settings can provide some of the best evidence. Challenges include judging the quality of such evidence and assisting programs to apply it. WHO and others should shift emphasis from RCTs to more relevant evidence when assessing public health issues.
منابع مشابه
Response to “A False Dichotomy: RCTs and Their Contributions to Evidence-Based Public Health”
‘‘Does it work’’ is always affected by context. The paradigm Hatt et al. put forward asserts that one strength of randomized trials is to answer definitively, ‘‘Does it work?’’ But for the kinds of complex programs public health must muster, there is generally no absolute answer to that question or to its companion question, ‘‘How well does it work?’’ Rather, the answer much depends on how and ...
متن کاملEffective Aid for Hitting the Bull’s Eye; Comment on “It’s About the Idea Hitting the Bull’s Eye”: How Aid Effectiveness Can Catalyse the Scale-up of Health Innovations”
This article studies how six key aid effectiveness principles for “Hitting the bull’s eye” can bring about the scale up of maternal and newborn health (MNH) interventions. These key principles are based on accepted international agreements such as the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. The results indicate that the six principles should be a guide for recipient countries to take ownership ...
متن کاملA False Dichotomy: RCTs and Their Contributions to Evidence-Based Public Health
Indeed, triangulating among different information sources and reviewing evidence systematically are the hallmarks of nuanced, ethically conducted, effective public health research. However, we take issue with Shelton’s opening statement that ‘‘randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have limited utility for public health’’ (p. 253). Rigorously designed randomized experiments and other impact evalua...
متن کاملAssessment public traditional medicine application barrieres in iran
Traditional medicine are used by some 60% of worlds population and in some countries are extensiveingly incorporated into the public health system. There are two types of evidence that can be used to support claims on traditional medicine; scientific evidence and traditional use. Long hystorical use of traditional medocine provide the safty and efficacy of it but it is not enough without enough...
متن کاملAssessment public traditional medicine application barrieres in iran
Traditional medicine are used by some 60% of worlds population and in some countries are extensiveingly incorporated into the public health system. There are two types of evidence that can be used to support claims on traditional medicine; scientific evidence and traditional use. Long hystorical use of traditional medocine provide the safty and efficacy of it but it is not enough without enough...
متن کامل